Authors’ Guidelines

Before beginning the submission process, we recommend that authors review our journal's section policies and Manuscript Preparation Guidelines. Registration with the journal is required prior to submission; if you are already registered, you can simply log in and start the five-step submission process. Manuscripts must be prepared according to the standards of the Journal of Salutogenic Architecture. Submissions not meeting these standards may be rejected without review.

 

New Submissions

All manuscripts must be submitted online, with each step handled digitally. Authors will be guided through the process of creating and uploading their files. This electronic submission process streamlines editorial handling, peer review, and publication.

Please submit your article via:  https://jsalutogenic.com/index.php/jsa/user/register

 

Minimum Submission Requirements

To start the review process, authors are required to submit at least four files:

  • a) Cover Letter
  • b) Manuscript Files: Use the 'Full Paper Template' provided. Submit two versions:

Manuscript File Template.docx

  • c) Publication Metadata Form:

                  Publication Metadata Form.docx

Note: All authors and co-authors must have an ORCID number. Ensure your ORCID profile is updated so our editors can access your previous publications. Obtain your ORCID number here.

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

Before submitting, ensure your manuscript meets the following guidelines:

  1. The submission has not been previously published or is under consideration elsewhere.
  2. A separate cover letter includes authors' titles, names, affiliations, email addresses, and ORCID numbers.
  3. Two versions of the manuscript are submitted: one without author details and one with author details.
  4. The Publication Metadata Form is completed and submitted.
  5. The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF format.
  6. DOI numbers and URLs are included for references where available.
  7. The manuscript uses double-spacing, 12-point font, italics instead of underlining, and places all figures/tables within the text.
  8. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  9. The manuscript has been checked for accidental plagiarism using recommended plagiarism checkers like iThenticate, DupliChecker, Grammarly, or PlagTracker.

Note: To ensure originality, your article will be checked by CrossCheck. For more information, refer to the CrossCheck Plagiarism Screening System.

 

Manuscript Structure

Your manuscript should include the following sections:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Additionally, include after the conclusions and before the reference’s sections for:

Acknowledgements

Funding

Conflict of Interests

Ethics Statements

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statements

 

Literature Citations: Properly acknowledge relevant literature. Manuscripts lacking appropriate citations of recent and pertinent references may be rejected without review.

Language Clarity: Ensure the manuscript is clear and understandable to a global audience. We recommend that a native English speaker with expertise in architecture review your manuscript.

Content Relevance: The manuscript must align with its title and fit within the scope of the Journal of Salutogenic Architecture.

Grant Support: If applicable, include acknowledgments for funding sources.

Article Subdivision: Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1, 2 (then 1.1, 1.1.1, etc.). The abstract is not included in section numbering.

In-text Citations: Ensure every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list and vice versa. Avoid citations in the abstract.

Reference List: Arrange references alphabetically and chronologically if necessary.

Reference Style: Follow the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition citation style. Include DOI numbers where available. Use recent references (preferably from the last five years) and avoid unofficial internet sources.

Note: Use reference management software like EndNote, Mendeley, or Microsoft Word's referencing tool in APA style.

Formatting: Manuscripts should be in Microsoft Word format, A4 size, Times New Roman, 12-point font for the abstract, keywords, and main text. The manuscript should not exceed 8,000 words, including references and appendices.

Use italics for emphasis, quotes, or sentences.

Note: Manuscripts not adhering to these guidelines may be rejected without review.

  • Title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Highlights
  • Contribution to the Field Statement
  • Introduction
  • Materials and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Funding
  • Conflict of Interests
  • Data Availability Statement
  • CRediT Author Statement
  • Appendices

 

Title

Your manuscript title should be concise and informative, reflecting the work's originality and relevance to the journal's scope. Limit the title to 15 words, clearly presenting the uniqueness and contribution of your work without abbreviations or acronyms.

Abstract

Summarize the major aspects of your paper in one paragraph of 200 words or less, following this sequence:

  • Introduction and Purpose: Highlight the significance of your research to engage readers.
  • Problem Statement: Identify the problem your research addresses and its scope.
  • Methods: Briefly describe the approaches or evidence used.
  • Results: Present specific data or general findings.
  • Implications: Suggest changes based on your findings and explain how your research adds to existing knowledge.

Avoid including:

  • Acronyms or abbreviations
  • Images or tables
  • Citations
  • Jargon or confusing terms
  • Lengthy background information
  • Redundant phrases

Writing Tips:

  • Write the abstract after completing your manuscript.
  • Focus on the main sections: purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.
  • Draft a rough version and refine it.
  • Have a colleague review it.

 

Keywords

Include 4-6 relevant keywords, each consisting of two or three words. Avoid single-word keywords to reduce false matches. Ensure all acronyms and abbreviations are fully spelled out.

 

Highlights

Summarize the novel results and new methods used in your study in bullet points (75 characters or fewer each), free of jargon, acronyms, or abbreviations.

Examples:

  • Evidence for the impact of salutogenic design on occupant well-being.
  • Proposal of a new model integrating nature into urban architecture.
  • Identification of strategies for enhancing mental health through design.

Note: Authors are required to provide "Highlights" with their submissions.

 

Contribution to the Field Statement

In 50 words, summarize your manuscript's contribution to existing literature. Highlight new knowledge and research findings, demonstrating your unique contribution compared to existing research. Write in clear language understandable to non-experts.

Examples:

  • This study introduces a framework for integrating salutogenic principles into architectural design, enhancing occupant well-being.
  • The paper explores the role of natural elements in urban architecture, proposing innovative strategies for mental health promotion.
  • Offering the first comparative analysis of salutogenic design in schools across cultures.

 

1. Introduction

Provide:

  • Research Context:
    • Importance of the topic
    • General statements about the topic
    • Overview of current research
  • Research Niche:
    • Challenge existing assumptions
    • Identify gaps in research
    • Formulate research questions
  • Your Research:
    • State the intent of your study
    • Outline key characteristics
    • Briefly describe important results
    • Provide an overview of the paper's structure

Note: Finalize the introduction after completing the rest of the paper.

 

2. Materials and Methods

Provide enough detail for replication. If methods are published, cite them and describe relevant modifications.

Do:

  • Be detailed about materials and equipment.
  • Organize with subheadings.
  • Describe data collection methods.
  • Mention ethical approvals if applicable.
  • Cite established protocols.
  • Specify software and tools.
  • Define variables and controls.
  • Detail statistical methods.
  • Ensure full reproducibility.
  • Describe any special conditions.

Don't:

  • Use vague descriptions.
  • Omit crucial details.
  • Include results or analysis here.
  • Use ambiguous terminology.
  • Assume familiarity with techniques.
  • Omit ethical approvals.
  • Re-explain known methods.
  • Generalize complex procedures.
  • Include irrelevant details.

 

3. Results

Present data and findings objectively without interpretation.

Do:

  • Use tables and figures for clarity.
  • Include all relevant results.
  • Organize with subheadings.
  • Reference figures and tables.
  • Provide statistical measures.
  • Present results logically.
  • Ensure consistency with methods.
  • Use visual aids effectively.

Don't:

  • Interpret or discuss results here.
  • Overwhelm with raw data.
  • Use vague expressions.
  • Exclude non-supporting findings.
  • Repeat information unnecessarily.
  • Use improperly labeled figures.
  • Include unanalyzed data.
  • Highlight trivial data.
  • Overuse undefined abbreviations.

 

4. Discussion

Explore the significance of your results.

Do:

  • Relate results to your hypotheses.
  • Compare with previous studies.
  • Discuss implications.
  • Explain unexpected results.
  • Acknowledge limitations.
  • Suggest real-world applications.
  • Identify remaining gaps.
  • Highlight influence on policy or practice.
  • Discuss strengths and weaknesses.

Don't:

  • Repeat results.
  • Overstate findings.
  • Introduce new data.
  • Ignore limitations.
  • Be biased or speculative.
  • Include unnecessary details.
  • Focus only on positives.
  • Use excessive jargon.

 

5. Conclusions

Present main conclusions briefly.

Do:

  • State main outcomes concisely.
  • Highlight importance and contributions.
  • Refer back to research questions.
  • Discuss real-world applications.
  • Suggest future research directions.
  • Emphasize what's new or unique.

Don't:

  • Introduce new information.
  • Repeat the abstract.
  • Overstate findings.
  • Discuss detailed methodology.
  • Ignore limitations.
  • Be vague or unfocused.
  • Rehash results.
  • Use technical jargon.

 

Acknowledgements

Recognize individuals or organizations that assisted in your research.

Do:

  • Mention those who provided support but are not authors.
  • State the type of assistance received.
  • Acknowledge funding bodies and grant numbers.
  • Keep the tone formal and respectful.

Don't:

  • Include co-authors.
  • Use informal language.
  • Thank without permission.

 

Funding

Indicate financial support:

  • If no funding: "This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors."
  • If funded: Provide details, e.g., "This work was supported by [Funding Agency] [grant number XXXXXXX]."

 

CRediT Author Statement

For transparency, outline individual contributions using CRediT roles (e.g., Conceptualization, Data Curation). More details and examples

 

Conflict of Interests

Declare any potential conflicts of interest. If none, state: "The author(s) declare no conflict of interest."

 

Data Availability Statement

Indicate data availability and access details. Guidelines for Data Availability Statements

 

Appendices

Label multiple appendices as A, B, etc. Number equations separately within each appendix. Tables and figures should follow a similar format.

 

Footnotes and Abbreviations

Avoid footnotes and abbreviations. If necessary, footnotes should contain additional text only. Explain abbreviations in tables and figures.

 

Responding to Reviewers' Comments

Receiving a request for revision—whether minor or major—indicates that the editors and reviewers recognize the original contribution of your article to the field of salutogenic architecture. While the revision process can be challenging, it's crucial to develop a strategy to fully understand each comment provided by the reviewers and editors. The primary reason for a revision request is that reviewers want to see how you improve your manuscript. They are interested in evaluating your academic expertise, ability, and professionalism during this process. A key aspect is your capacity to perceive different perspectives on a single concern and apply the feedback throughout various parts of your manuscript. If reviewers find your responses inadequate or are dissatisfied with the quality of your revisions, they may decide to reject your manuscript.

 

 

Minimum Requirements for Submitting the Revised Manuscript

To ensure a smooth resubmission process, please include the following documents:

  • Rebuttal Letter: This is your opportunity to address the reviewers directly—clarify misunderstandings, defend your work, and outline the improvements made. The letter should include your manuscript details and a brief note about the resubmission, typically written by the corresponding author.
  • Author's Response to Reviewers and Editor Comments: In this document, provide detailed explanations of how you've addressed each comment from the editors and reviewers, justifying your responses.
  • Tracked Changes Document: Submit your revised manuscript with all changes clearly highlighted using tools like Microsoft Word's "Track Changes" feature. This makes your revisions easily identifiable.
  • Clean Version: Provide a final, clean copy of your manuscript without any markup or highlights, showcasing your work in its final form. This version is usually uploaded as the main manuscript file, allowing the editor to read your work without distractions.

Please ensure all these documents are included with your resubmission to facilitate an efficient review process. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

What Authors Should Do During Revision

Do's:

Choose Your Battles Wisely: Even if you disagree with a minor suggestion from a reviewer, it's often best to implement the change to show your openness to feedback.

Clearly Indicate Changes: Make sure all modifications are clearly marked in the text.

Separate Versions: Keep the version with tracked changes separate from the clean manuscript.

Respond Individually to Comments: Address each reviewer’s comment individually, explaining how you have addressed it or providing a rationale if you chose not to make the change.

Provide Detailed Responses: Offer a thorough, point-by-point response to the reviewers.

Express Gratitude: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and effort. Remember, they volunteer their time to help improve your manuscript.

Be Diplomatic in Disagreements: If you disagree with a comment, explain your perspective politely and provide supporting evidence, such as supplementary figures or tables.

 

What Authors Should Avoid During Revision

Don'ts:

Don't Ignore Concerns: Do not overlook any issues raised by a reviewer. Address each comment by making the change or explaining why you did not.

Avoid Generic Closing Statements: Steer clear of ending your letter with generic phrases like, “We would like to thank the reviewer again for taking the time to review our manuscript.”

Don't Assume Misunderstandings Are Due to Reviewer Ignorance: If a reviewer didn't understand something, it's likely that your explanation needs to be clearer.

Don't Give Simple Yes or No Answers: Even for minor corrections like typos, specify what was corrected. For more significant errors, an apology may be appropriate.

Don't Dodge Specific Questions: Avoiding or ignoring specific questions from reviewers could lead to rejection of your revision.

Don't Be Vague About Changes: Instead of saying, “I've made all the recommended changes,” detail how each change was made.

Don't Take Comments Personally: Keep the tone professional and objective.

 

For more guidance, please refer to:

  1. How to Respond to Reviewers’ Comments: A Practical Guide for Authors by Cristina N.
  2.  How to Respond to Reviewer Comments – The CALM Way by Catherine Carnovale.
  3. How to Write an Effective “Response to Reviewers” Letter by Jeff Offutt.

 

Reference Style

All manuscripts must adhere to the American Psychological Association (APA) 7th edition citation style, widely used in the social sciences. Authors should consult the latest APA Publication Manual when preparing their references.

 

Journal Articles

Format:

  • Author(s). (Year). Title of the article. Title of Journal, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/DOI

Example:

  • Green, L. M., & White, S. K. (2023). The impact of salutogenic design on urban well-being. Journal of Salutogenic Architecture, 9(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsa.2023.xxxx

 

Books

Format:

Example:

  • Brown, T. E. (2022). Designing for Health: Principles of Salutogenic Architecture (2nd ed.). Wellness Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5678/wellnesspub.2022.005

 

Book Chapters

Format:

  • Author(s) of Chapter. (Year). Title of the chapter. In Editor(s) (Ed.), Title of the book (pp. page range). Publisher. https://doi.org/DOI

Example:

  • Smith, J. A., & Lee, K. M. (2023). Biophilic elements in urban spaces. In R. Davis & L. Nguyen (Eds.), Innovations in Urban Health Design (pp. 150-172). Healthy Living Press. https://doi.org/10.8910/healthyliving.2023.007

 

Translated Books

Format:

  • Author(s). (Year). Title of the book (Translator's Name, Trans.). Publisher. (Original work published Year)

Example:

  • García Márquez, G. (2021). Cien años de soledad (E. Grossman, Trans.). HarperCollins. (Original work published 1967)

 

Book Reviews

Format:

  • Reviewer, A. A. (Year). [Review of the book Title of book, by B. B. Author]. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page numbers. https://doi.org/DOI

Example:

  • Patel, R. K. (2023). [Review of the book Healing Architecture: Spaces for Well-being, by M. Thompson]. International Journal of Architectural Studies, 15(2), 220-222. https://doi.org/10.4567/ijas.2023.0220

 

Theses and Dissertations

Published Thesis or Dissertation

Example:

  • Chen, L. H. (2022). Exploring the Role of Natural Light in Salutogenic Design [Doctoral dissertation, University of Global Health]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://doi.org/10.7890/proquest.2022.12345

Unpublished Thesis or Dissertation

Example:

  • Anderson, P. J. (2021). Community Engagement in Urban Design [Unpublished master's thesis]. City College of Architecture.

 

Conference Papers

Published Conference Paper

Example:

  • Singh, A., & Zhao, L. (2023, September 10-12). Integrating Green Spaces in High-Density Urban Areas [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Sustainable Architecture, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.2345/icsa.2023.0456

Conference Proceedings (Book Form)

Example:

  • Kim, Y. J. (2023). The future of sustainable materials. In D. Wang & S. Patel (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sustainable Materials Conference (pp. 75-89). EcoDesign Press. https://doi.org/10.3456/smc.2023.0075

 

Newspaper and Magazine Articles

Newspaper Article

Example:

  • Jackson, T. (2023, August 15). Urban parks: A breath of fresh air. The Daily Times, pp. A1, A4.

Magazine Article

Example:

  • Lopez, M. (2023, July). Designing for wellness: Trends in architecture. Architectural Digest, 58-64.

 

Electronic Resources

Online Article

Example:

  • Martinez, S. (2023). The role of technology in modern architecture. Digital Architecture Review. Retrieved from https://www.digitalarchreview.com/tech-in-architecture

Software

Example:

  • EcoSoft Solutions. (2023). EcoDesign Pro (Version 4.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.ecosoftsolutions.com/ecodesignpro

 

Datasets

Example:

 

Lecture Notes and Presentations

PowerPoint Slides

Example:

  • Thompson, E. (2023). Sustainable Urban Development [PowerPoint slides]. Open University Lecture Series. Retrieved from https://www.openuniversity.edu/lectures/sustainable-urban-development

 

Reports

Example:

  • United Nations Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/wcr2022

 

Press Releases

Example:

  • International WELL Building Institute. (2023, May 5). Introducing the WELL Community Standard [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.wellcertified.com/press/well-community-standard

 

Blog Posts

Example:

  • Nguyen, T. (2023, June 20). The importance of natural elements in architecture. Design for Health Blog. Retrieved from https://www.designforhealthblog.com/natural-elements

 

Social Media Posts

Twitter

Example:

 

Podcasts

Example:

 

Videos

YouTube Video

Example:

 

Dictionary or Encyclopedia Entries

Example:

  • Davis, K. (2023). Salutogenesis. In M. Johnson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Health (pp. 789-790). Health Sciences Press.

 

Organizational Reports

Example:

  • World Green Building Council. (2023). Advancing Net Zero: Status Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.worldgbc.org/advancing-net-zero

 

Webpages and Online Documents

Example:

 

Software

Example:

  • Smith, J. (2023). LightSim (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. LightSim Technologies.

 

Note: For additional guidance on APA style references, authors may consult resources provided by the American Psychological Association or reputable academic institutions.

 

Number of Authors in In-text Citations

The format for in-text citations varies based on the number of authors:

One Author

  • Narrative: Smith (2023) explains...
  • Parenthetical: (Smith, 2023)

Two Authors

  • Narrative: Smith and Lee (2022) found...
  • Parenthetical: (Smith & Lee, 2022)

Three or More Authors

  • Narrative: Johnson et al. (2021) suggest...
  • Parenthetical: (Johnson et al., 2021)

Groups or Organizations as Authors

  • First Citation:
    • Narrative: World Health Organization (WHO, 2023) reports...
    • Parenthetical: (World Health Organization [WHO], 2023)
  • Subsequent Citations:
    • Narrative: WHO (2023) indicates...
    • Parenthetical: (WHO, 2023)

Works with the Same Author and Year

When citing multiple works by the same author in the same year:

  • In-text:
    • Smith (2023a) discusses...
    • Smith (2023b) also notes...
  • Reference List:
    • Smith, A. B. (2023a). Title of article one. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/...
    • Smith, A. B. (2023b). Title of article two. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/...

 

Citing References in the Text

Ensure that every in-text citation corresponds to an entry in the reference list.

Two Authors

Always include both authors' names:

  • Narrative: "As demonstrated by Brown and Davis (2022)..."
  • Parenthetical: "(Brown & Davis, 2022)"

Three or More Authors

Use the first author's surname followed by "et al.":

  • Narrative: "Green et al. (2021) found that..."
  • Parenthetical: "(Green et al., 2021)"

No Author

Use the title or a shortened version of the title:

  • ("Impact of Urban Design," 2023)

Anonymous Work

Use "Anonymous" as the author:

  • (Anonymous, 2023)

Authors with the Same Last Name

Include the authors' initials:

  • (L. Smith, 2022; P. Smith, 2022)

Multiple Works by the Same Author

List years chronologically, separated by commas:

  • (Williams, 2019, 2020, 2021)

Secondary Sources

If the original source is unavailable:

  • (Taylor, 2018, as cited in Johnson, 2023)

Direct Quotations

Include the page number:

  • (Davis, 2023, p. 45)

Personal Communications

Cite in text only:

  • (J. Doe, personal communication, May 5, 2023)

Note: For works not in English, provide an English translation of the title in brackets.

 

Referencing Tables and Figures in the Text

  • Refer to tables and figures by their numbers:
    • "As shown in Table 2..."
    • "Figure 3 illustrates..."

 

Direct Quotes in APA Style

Include author, year, and page number:

  • Short Quote: "Design influences well-being" (Smith, 2023, p. 12).
  • Long Quote (40 words or more): Indent the quote without quotation marks.

 

Abbreviations in APA References

Common abbreviations include:

  • Edition: ed.
  • Editor(s): Ed. or Eds.
  • No date: n.d.
  • Page(s): p. or pp.
  • Volume(s): Vol. or Vols.

 

Reference Management Software

We recommend using software to manage your references efficiently:

These tools help format citations and reference lists according to APA style.

 

 

English Editing and Proofreading

Manuscripts should be written in clear, fluent English. Authors who are non-native English speakers are encouraged to have their manuscripts reviewed by a professional editing service or a proficient English speaker in the field of architecture.

Note: Use "Track Changes" in Microsoft Word during editing. Submit both the final version and the version with tracked changes.

 

After Acceptance

Online Proof Correction

A PDF proof will be sent to the corresponding author. Please review it carefully and approve or indicate any necessary corrections promptly to ensure timely publication.