The Interplay of Water, Space, and Human Behaviour: Urban Morphology by means of Urban Palimpsest and Juxtaposition Concepts at the Bosphorus

Beyza Kurtulmus; Selin Yıldız

doi:10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol4no1_12

Authors

Beyza Kurtulmus Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Türkiye Author https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7641-0207
Selin Yıldız Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Türkiye Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-6940

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol4no1_12

Keywords:

Urban Morphology, Coastal Urbanism, Urban Palimpsest and Juxtaposition, Participatory Planning, Bosphorus of Istanbul, Smart City Development

Abstract

The interplay of water, space, and human behaviour plays a central role in shaping the morphological development of coastal cities. This study focuses on Istanbul’s Bosphorus to examine how historically layered environments respond to rapid urbanism. The research explores how coastal cities can strengthen morphological resilience through the concepts of urban palimpsest and urban juxtaposition. A systematic literature review of 144 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2025) was conducted to assess how theory and practice address spatial configuration, heritage continuity, and public behaviour in waterfront planning. The results reveal a critical gap between theoretical models and applied urban practices, particularly in addressing adaptive spatial structures, heritage integration, and participatory planning in water-bound cities. This study addresses a major gap in urban morphology literature by offering a comprehensive framework that links morphological resilience with interdisciplinary planning for both theoretical and practical perspectives. It introduces a novel synthesis of water–space dynamics, spatial morphology, and human interaction, grounded in the context of Istanbul’s coastal transformation. By conceptualizing the Bosphorus as both a living spatial archive and a planning challenge, the study provides a transferable model that advances scholarly understanding and supports salutogenic, resilient design in coastal urbanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Hankawi, W. S., & Al-Bsherawee, Q. R. (2024). Juxtapositions: A strategy for urban sustainable dynamics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3203, 050100. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0212297

Al-Kodmany, K. (2013). Placemaking in the high rise city: Architectural and urban design analyses. International Journal of High Rise Buildings, 2(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2013.2.2.153

Angheloiu, C., & Tennant, M. (2023). Mind the Gap: Defining Urban Resilience Knowledge-Implementation Gaps. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy, 5(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2023-0013

Bartu Candan, A., & Kolluoğlu, B. (2015). Emerging Spaces of Neoliberalism: A Gated Town and a Public Housing Project in İstanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey, 39, 5-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005057

Bell, G., & Dourish, P. (2007). The infrastructure of experience and the experience of infrastructure: Meaning and structure in everyday encounters with space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32035t

Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. .

Čakarić, J. (2010). Water phenomenon: Urban morphology transformation. Facta Universitatis - Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 8(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE1004375C

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Taner, O., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places, urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457

Conzen, M. R. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers.

Cooper, H. (1988). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Cozens, P., Love, T., & Davern, B. (2019). Geographical Juxtaposition: A New Direction in CPTED. Social Sciences, 8(9), Article 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090252

Erkan, N., & Akın, O. (2015). Kentsel dokuyu oluşturan bileşenler ışığında doku çözümlemesinde farklı yöntem ve tekniklerin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu (pp. 439-451). Megaron, 10. cilt, 3. sayı.

Erkılıç, G. (2019). This is not a line: Critical delineation of the coastline in Istanbul. (Master's Thesis, ITU Istanbul Technical University). YOK Thesis Center.

Gehl, J. (2013). Life between buildings: Using public space (6th ed.). In J. Gehl, & S. Birgitte, How to Study Public Life. Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0

Göksel, Ç., & Doğru, A. Ö. (2019). Analyzing the urbanization in the protection area of the Bosphorus. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(2), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.446912

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. A. Coser, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Hein, C. (2004). The Capital of Europe: Architecture and Urban Planning for the European Union. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hisar, A. Ş. (1942). Boğaziçi Mehtapları. Hilmi Publication House.

Hisar, A. Ş. (2009). Boğaziçi Mehtapları (Reprint ed.). Yapı Kredi Publications.

Ilık Saltık, Ö. (2025). Preserving and rehabilitating the historic urban landscape of Istanbul: A case study of the Büyükdere district. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 13(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.316

Kropf, K. (2018). Plots, property and behavior. Urban Morphology, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v22i1.4068

Kubat, A. S. (2019). Exploring the fringe belt phenomenon in a multi nuclear city: The case of Istanbul. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7 (Special Issue “Urban Morphology”), 95-134. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.83

Langie, K., Rybak-Niedziółka, K., & Hubačíková, V. (2022). Principles of designing water elements in public spaces of cities. Sustainability, 14(11), 6877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116877

Le Corbusier. (1929). The city of tomorrow and its planning (F. Etchells, Trans.). Rodker.

Lovering, J., & Türkmen, H. (2011). Bulldozer Neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The State-led Construction of Property Markets, and the Displacement of the Urban Poor. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.552477

Maki, F. (1964). Investigations in collective form. In School of Architecture, Washington University, St. Louis (pp. 3-85). https://doi.org/10.7936/3r0q-4715

Marshall, S. (2005). Streets and patterns. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203589397

Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v1i1.4047

Oktay, G. (2023). Abdülhak Şinasi Hisar’ın “Anlatıları”nda Geçmiş Zaman “Tutunamayanlar”ı. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(26), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33207/trkede.1194370

Oliveira, V. (2016). Urban morphology: An Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0

Rapoport, A. (1983). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Sage Publications.

Ripp, M., Egusquiza, A., & Lückerath, D. (2024). Urban Heritage Resilience: An integrated and operationable definition from the SHELTER and ARCH projects. Land, 13(12), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122052

Sarihan, E., & Lovra, É. (2024). Uncovering Urban Palimpsest through Descriptive and Analytical Approaches to Urban Morphology—Understanding the Ottoman Urban Fabric of Bursa, Türkiye. Land, 13(9), 1435. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091435

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Şahin, A., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2025). How does urban regeneration affect urban morphology? A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.13.3_79

Tan, D., & Nguyen, M. Q. (2024). Beyond the palimpsest: Traditions and modernity in urban villages of Shenzhen, China. Cities, 151, Article 105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105093

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.

Vergara-Perucich, F., & Arias-Loyola, M. (2024). Commodification in urban planning: Exploring the habitus of practitioners in a neoliberal context. Social Sciences, 13(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13010022

Whitehand, J. W. (2001). British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v5i2.3896

Yasar, D., & Kaymak Heinz, G. (2024). Spatial Continuum in History: Pier Buildings on the Bosphorus and Golden Horn, Istanbul. Buildings, 14(11), 3531. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113531