Neuro-Spatial Legibility and Perceived Navigational Stress in Educational Environments: An Exploratory Qualitative Assessment Framework

Authors

  • Narimen Draouil Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Altinbas, Istanbul, Turkiye Author
  • Aykut Karaman Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Altinbas, Istanbul, Turkiye Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol5no1_3

Keywords:

Neuro-architecture, Spatial Legibility, Neuro-Spatial Strain, Wayfinding, Educational Environments, Qualitative Assessment

Abstract

Cognitive processing, emotional regulation, and navigational behavior are influenced by spatial organization and environmental stimuli in educational environments. Research in neuro-architecture, environmental psychology, and spatial analysis has increasingly demonstrated the relationship between built environments and human cognition. However, existing methods provide limited practical means for systematically evaluating spatial conditions associated with anxiety in educational settings. This study addresses this gap by developing and applying the Neuro-Spatial Legibility Assessment Framework (NSLAF), a qualitative method integrating Spatial Legibility (SL), Sensory Regulation (SR), and Transitional Clarity (TC). NSLAF follows a three-phase protocol comprising spatial mapping, structured environmental assessment, and interpretive synthesis. The framework was applied to Lycée de Ben Arous, a public secondary school in Tunis, Tunisia, through a qualitative case study supported by architectural analysis, circulation mapping, structured observation, sensory assessment, a pilot student perception survey (n = 30), and comparison with a reference school. Findings identified locations associated with heightened neuro-spatial strain, particularly circulation intersections, entrance thresholds, and visually repetitive movement sequences. These areas showed reduced spatial legibility, greater sensory demands, unclear transitions, navigational uncertainty, and increased cognitive demand. Convergence among architectural observations and student perceptions supported NSLAF's internal consistency. The framework provides a qualitative methodology for identifying neuro-spatial challenges and informing evidence-based interventions in existing educational environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Narimen Draouil, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, University of Altinbas, Istanbul, Turkiye

    I am an architectural researcher with an interest in creating more inclusive and human-centered environments. My research lies at the intersection of neuroarchitecture, neurodiversity, and spatial experience, exploring how the design of learning and public welfare spaces can support wellbeing and participation. I have had the opportunity to collaborate on international, interdisciplinary research projects and enjoy learning from diverse perspectives and experiences. Outside of research, I enjoy connecting with others who share an interest in the relationship between mind, body, and space. I am fluent in Arabic, French, English, and Turkish.

References

Abbas, S., Okdeh, N., Roufayel, R., Kovacic, H., & Sabatier, J. M. (2024). Neuro-architecture: How the perception of our surroundings impacts the brain. Biology, 13(4), Article 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040220

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass.

Attaianese, E., Barilà, M., & Perillo, M. (2025). Exploring neuroscientific approaches to architecture: Design strategies of the built environment for improving human performance. Buildings, 15(19), Article 3524. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193524

Azzazy, S., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., & Doborjeh, Z. (2021). A critical review on the impact of the built environment on users' measured brain activity. Architectural Science Review, 64(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1749980

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Devlin, A. S. (2014). Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040423

Dilani, A. (2008). Ecological and salutogenic design for a sustainable, healthy global society. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the International Academy for Design and Health. International Academy for Design and Health.

Erkan, İ. (2019). Examining wayfinding behaviours in architectural spaces using brain imaging with electroencephalography (EEG). Architectural Science Review, 62(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1523129

Erkan, İ. (2024). The neuro-cognitive approach to urban planning: Wayfinding behavior analysis and its effect on urban planning. Journal of Urban Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2289144

Evans, G. W., & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When buildings don't work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0089

Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (4th ed.). Optimal Books.

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Hamilton, D. K., & Watkins, D. H. (2009). Evidence-based design for multiple building types. John Wiley & Sons.

Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: A scoping review of neuro-architecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(6), Article 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062193

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.

Kazak, J. K., & van Hoof, J. (2025). Mindful design for well-being: Exploring neuro-architecture in the built environment. Indoor and Built Environment, 34(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X251313892

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.

Maxwell, L. E. (2016). School building condition, social climate, student attendance, and academic achievement: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.009

Mostafa, M. (2014). Architecture for autism: Autism ASPECTSS™ in school design. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i1.314

O'Neill, M. J. (1991). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591235002

Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding in architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Shemesh, A., Talmon, R., Karp, O., Amir, I., & Grobman, Y. J. (2017). Affective response to architecture: Investigating human reaction to spaces with different geometry. Architectural Science Review, 60(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266597

Sternberg, E. M. (2009). Healing spaces: The science of place and well-being. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Tanner, C. K. (2009). Effects of school design on student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910955809

Tawil, N., & Kühn, S. (2024). The built environment and the brain: Review of emerging methods to investigate the impact of viewing architectural design. In Environmental neuroscience (pp. 161–181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64699-7_9

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402

Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: Way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581132004

Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094693

094693

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Draouil, N., & Karaman, A. (2026). Neuro-Spatial Legibility and Perceived Navigational Stress in Educational Environments: An Exploratory Qualitative Assessment Framework. Journal of Salutogenic Architecture, 5(1), 38-68. https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol5no1_3

Similar Articles

21-30 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.