Quality and Quantity Parameters for Developing Urban Design Regulations for Public Open Spaces in Kerala

Dilshana Siyad; T Ashfina; Nirmal Chandy Mathew

doi:10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol4no1_15

Authors

Dilshana Siyad Department of Architecture, Post Graduate Student of College of Engineering, Trivandrum, Kerala, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2472-9010
T Ashfina Department of Architecture, Faculty of College of Engineering, Trivandrum, Kerala, India Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-0493
Nirmal Chandy Mathew Department of Architecture, Faculty of College of Engineering, Trivandrum, Kerala, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1651-1143

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol4no1_15

Keywords:

Open space, Public space, Urbanisation, Ecosystem, Landscape, Urban resilience, Quality of open space

Abstract

Urbanization is rapidly diminishing open spaces, presenting numerous challenges for Kerala, including reduced access to green areas, intensified urban heat island effects, fragmented ecosystems, diminished water retention, erosion, pollution, weakened community cohesion, economic impacts, loss of cultural identity, and decreased resilience to climate change. This study aims to address these issues by developing a comprehensive framework for open spaces in Kerala, ensuring both quantitative and qualitative standards are met. Through a detailed examination of existing policy frameworks and master plans, significant gaps were identified in the criteria used to assess the quantity and quality of public open spaces. To bridge these gaps, this research identifies essential qualitative and quantitative parameters necessary for creating a robust and context-specific framework for Kerala. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, including policy analysis, stakeholder interviews, and field assessments, to formulate actionable guidelines. The findings contribute to improved urban planning practices, promoting sustainable, accessible, and culturally relevant open spaces in Kerala, enhancing overall urban resilience and community well-being

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abhilash, R. S., & Chandy, M. N. (2016). Ensuring public realm through private-private partnership, in the context of rapid urbanization (case of CBD area Kochi). Procedia Technology, 24, 1652–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.181

Amirtahmasebi, R., Orloff, M., Wahba, S., & Altman, A. (2016). Singapore: Urban redevelopment of the Singapore city waterfront. In S. Wahba (Ed.), Regenerating urban land: A practitioner’s guide to leveraging private investment (pp. 345–384). World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0473-1_ch10

Bambó Naya, R., de la Cal Nicolás, P., Díez Medina, C., Ezquerra, I., García-Pérez, S., & Monclús, J. (2023). Quality of public space and sustainable development goals: Analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.01.002

Carmona, M. (2018). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3

Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (2007). Needs in public space. In T. Moudon & A. L. M. Salvesen (Eds.), Urban design reader (pp. 225–235). Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080468129-36

Conn, S., Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2006). Rethinking urban parks: Public space and cultural diversity. The Antioch Review, 64(3), 577. https://doi.org/10.2307/4615042

Davies, W. K. D. (2015). Conclusions: Creating more liveable and sustainable urban places. In W. K. D. Davies (Ed.), Theme cities: Solutions for urban problems (pp. 587–599). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9655-2_16

Department of Planning. (2012). State urbanization report.

Dunham, H. W. (1960). [Review of the book The image of the city by K. Lynch]. Social Problems, 8(3), 280–281. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1960.8.3.03a00190

Gangwar, G. (2018). Fusion of traditional and modern principles of design for public spaces of Indian cities. In H. S. Murthy (Ed.), Urbanization challenges in emerging economies (Vol. 8, pp. 275–289). American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482032.029

Gehl, J. (2020). Three types of outdoor activities; Life between buildings; Outdoor activities and the quality of outdoor space. In R. T. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds.), The city reader (7th ed., pp. 593–602). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261732-69

Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. (2014). Choice Reviews Online, 51(11), 51-5993–51–5993. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-5993

Hossein, S. (2018). Urbanization: Planting forests in pots. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2(2), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.4676

Ignou. (n.d.). Open spaces.

Irrigation Department, E. (2021). Flood mitigation Kochi.

Jacobs, J. (2009). The social life of small urban spaces. In A. M. Salvesen (Ed.), Common ground? (pp. 42–49). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873960-9

Kannur Municipal Corporation. (n.d.). Master plan for Kannur City, 2041. Retrieved from http://www.kslublris.com/watershed/

Knuijt, M. (2020). Liveable green cities: Integrating climate adaptive solutions and circular economy into the built environment. In S. Roggema (Ed.), Designing sustainable cities (pp. 87–99). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54686-1_6

Kochi Municipal Corporation. (n.d.). Master plan for Kochi Municipal Corporation Area - 2040. Retrieved from https://en-in.topographic-map.com/map-s9s1h/Kochi/

Landman, K. (2013). Design for diversity: Exploring socially mixed neighbourhoods. Urban Design International, 18(3), 250–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.4

Li, J., Dang, A., & Song, Y. (2022). Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness. Journal of Urban Management, 11(4), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005

Lorenzo, M., Ríos-Rodríguez, M. L., Suárez, E., Hernández, B., & Rosales, C. (2023). Quality analysis and categorisation of public space. Heliyon, 9(3), e13861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13861

Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (1995). Urban form and social context: Cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400202

Madanipour, A. (2021). Whose public space? In S. M. Low & N. M. Smith (Eds.), Public space reader (pp. 436–443). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-64

Maharjan, A., & Yadav, S. K. (2023). Public open space assessment and management: A case of Damak Municipality, Jhapa, Nepal. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 11(2), 1401–1412. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.49285

Matan, A. (2017). Jan Gehl. In A. M. Edensor & I. Dobraszczyk (Eds.), Key thinkers on cities (pp. 99–104). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983243.n16

Mehta, V. (2013). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698

Novy, J. (2012). Jane Jacobs, The death and life of great American cities. In J. E. O. Müller & T. Schmidt (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Kulturwissenschaften (pp. 296–299). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839413272-099

Praliya, S., & Garg, P. (2019). Public space quality evaluation: Prerequisite for public space management. The Journal of Public Space, 4(1), 93–126. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v4i1.667

Sadri, S. Z. (2017). The scale of public space: Taksim Square in Istanbul. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.25034/1761.1(1)67-75

Sasanpour, F. (2017). Livable city one step towards sustainable development. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1(3), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3673

Şenik, B., & Uzun, O. (2022). A process approach to the open green space system planning. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-021-00492-5

The Asia Organisation. (2015). Urban and regional development plans.

Thiruvananthapuram Corporation. (n.d.). Thiruvananthapuram Master Plan 2040.

Thrissur Municipal Corporation. (n.d.). Master plan for Thrissur City - 2039.

Tibbalds, F. (Ed.). (2012). Making people-friendly towns. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469521

Town and Country Planning Department, Government of Kerala. (n.d.). Master plan for Kozhikode urban area – 2035.

UN-Habitat. (2020). City-wide public space assessment toolkit: A guide to community-led digital inventory and assessment. https://unhabitat.org/city-wide-public-space-assessment-toolkit-a-guide-to-community-led-digital-inventory-and-assessment

Urban Redevelopment Authority, Singapore. (n.d.). Guidelines.

Uzgoren, G. (2016). A comparative study on the relationship between quality of space and urban space activities in the public open spaces. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2016.42650

Zube, E. H., & Moore, G. T. (Eds.). (1989). Advances in environment, behavior, and design. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0717-4